I have been hearing about 'Agile' in relation to Project management. I understand from dictionary that Agile means "able to move quickly and easily". Very well said and extremely desirable for business success under VUCA and what not!!
Further search informs that this concept was coined in 2001 and mainly for managing software development projects.
I read the menifesto:
*Manifesto for Agile Software Development*
"We are uncovering better ways of developing
software by doing it and helping others do it.
Through this work we have come to value:
- Individuals and interactions over processes and tools,
- Working software over comprehensive documentation,
- Customer collaboration over contract negotiation,
- Responding to change over following a plan."
I could not understand much and so looked for commentary. I read:
"Agile is an iterative approach to project management and software development that helps teams deliver value to their customers faster and with fewer headaches. Instead of betting everything on a "big bang" launch, an agile team delivers work in small, but consumable, increments. Requirements, plans, and results are evaluated continuously so teams have a natural mechanism for responding to change quickly."
Am I wrong if I conclude that unlike waterfall (traditional methodology) there is no method in this madness? Does this methodology suggest there is no need to develop basic user requirement document and no need to plan or plan on daily basis in stand up meetings?
I read there is an associated concept of 'Sprint' as opposed to traditional way of developing detailed plan and execution. Does Sprint mean changing plan on daily basis? Is there a recommended shortest period for Planning without change? I learnt there was specification of few days to a month. Is it that the nature of product will decide period for which one Sprint will last?
There are experts in this broadcast group and in IT field. I will be obliged if you can help me understand this methodology.
I believe and I may be out of date, there is difference between agility, dynamism and parkinson's disease. Organizations can not be dynamic to the extent of loosing stability.