At the airport last week, I watched a young man stare at his phone for a long minute, his shoulders dropping slightly with each re-read. I didn't know what the message said. But I recognized the posture — I have worn it myself, decades apart, over a telegram once, and later, an email.
It took me back to a young executive I once mentored, who'd received a two-line note from his boss and had spent the whole evening rehearsing apologies for a meeting that turned out to be about something else entirely.
The feeling in both cases was the same — a quiet flicker of dread. And in both cases, it would normally just pass. A few uneasy hours, a resolved misunderstanding, and the moment is forgotten — filed away as "anxiety," nothing more.
What's missed is what the dread reveals: not a problem with the message, but a skill gap — the ability to separate fact from inference under uncertainty. Left unexamined, that gap doesn't go away. It just resurfaces, slightly bigger, the next time a message, a silence, or a delay shows up. Daniel Kahneman would call this the unchecked rule of System 1 — fast, emotional, and confident, with System 2 never invited to the table.
The tool worth naming here is simple: before reacting to anything that spikes a feeling, ask one question — what do I actually know, versus what am I predicting? It takes ten seconds and it is the entire difference between a reaction and a response.
That young man at the airport may never know I noticed him. But he reminded me that this particular gap — mistaking prediction for fact — is something most of us carry, unexamined, for years.
If this resonates: Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow is the foundational text on System 1/System 2 thinking — worth the first three chapters alone if the whole book feels long.
Next: what happens when the story we tell about someone else's silence turns out to be entirely our own invention.
No comments:
Post a Comment