Corona has changed the life at workplace. I have been not just advised but at times instructed not to come to office. The instructions are more out of love, affection and care for an old man, otherwise susceptible to infections and viruses.
That has converted all meetings virtual, to an extent that those in office also connect from their workstations!! This has also resulted into delayed acquaintances with new team members. And you can not blame that young, new member of the team who has not seen my grey hair and balding head, nor heard my guttural tone, if he, when he joins that virtual meeting and reads name in the box I occupy, Atul Mankad, addresses me as “Hi, Atul, we have not met”. And that addressing me by first name pulls him down in my esteem.
I have, in old days, when I was still old, been nasty at times and have told and at times written to such young person that “I prefer being addressed as Mr Mankad”. As a result, barring such brand new joinee, those who are very close to me and relatively older call me ‘Atulbhai’ or ‘ARM’, the others address me as ‘Mr Mankad’ or just ‘Sir’.
Today, having had similar experience, I wondered, from where and when do young children learn to address others? Are they taught how does one demonstrate respect for others, even when the other person does not deserve respect?
I looked for information based on studies in social sciences. I framed following prompts:
1. We find people addressing each other depending on intimacy or nature of relationship, differently. What are different cultural overtones as they relate to addressing others?
2. Generational overtones are observed surpassing traditional cultural nuances. Are there corroborating studies or evidences?
3. Are there studies to evaluate effect on psychology of people of older generations cohabitating with millennials at Workplaces?
After trying to collate responses from multiple AI Bots, the information provided by ChatGPT sounds comprehensive and logical.
Please read on. It is always good to be aware and make our children aware:
The way people address each other varies significantly across cultures and is often influenced by factors such as intimacy, social hierarchy, and cultural norms. Here are a few examples of how different cultures approach forms of address:
1. Japan:
- Suffixes: Japanese people often use honorifics (suffixes) to show respect and the nature of their relationship. For example, "-san" is a common respectful suffix, "-sama" is more respectful and formal, and "-kun" and "-chan" are used for close friends or younger people.
- Titles and Last Names: It is common to address someone by their last name followed by a suffix, especially in formal settings. First names are usually reserved for close friends and family.
2. United States:
- First Names: Americans often use first names even in professional settings, which reflects a more casual and egalitarian culture.
- Titles: In formal or professional contexts, titles like "Mr.", "Mrs.", "Dr." followed by the last name are used.
3. France:
- Formal vs. Informal: The use of "vous" (formal 'you') and "tu" (informal 'you') is important in French. Addressing someone as "vous" shows respect and distance, while "tu" indicates closeness and familiarity.
- Titles: Titles such as "Monsieur", "Madame", and "Mademoiselle" are used in more formal interactions.
4. India:
- Respect for Elders: It's common to address elders and authority figures with titles such as "Uncle", "Auntie", or "Sir/Madam" even if they are not related.
- First Names and Nicknames: Among peers and friends, first names or affectionate nicknames are often used.
5. China:
- Titles and Surnames: In formal settings, people are often addressed by their title (e.g., "Manager Li") or surname followed by a respectful term.
- Family Terms: It is common to address people with familial terms like "Aunt", "Uncle", even if they are not family.
6. Germany:
- Formality: Germans tend to be more formal, using "Herr" (Mr.) or "Frau" (Mrs./Ms.) followed by the last name in professional and formal contexts.
- First Names: First names are usually reserved for close friends and family.
These cultural nuances highlight the importance of understanding and respecting different ways of addressing others, which can help in building better interpersonal relationships and avoiding misunderstandings.
Generational differences in forms of address and communication styles have been observed and studied across various cultures, indicating shifts that sometimes surpass traditional cultural nuances. Here are some studies and evidences:
1. Shift Towards Informality:
- A study by the Pew Research Center found that younger generations, particularly Millennials and Gen Z, are more comfortable with informal communication styles and addressing people by their first names, even in professional settings. This trend reflects a broader cultural shift towards egalitarianism and away from hierarchical norms .
2. Workplace Communication:
- Research published in the Journal of Intercultural Communication indicates that generational differences in the workplace can lead to varying expectations about communication and addressing colleagues. Younger employees often prefer less formal communication, which can sometimes clash with older colleagues' expectations of formality and respect .
3. Technology and Communication:
- The rise of digital communication platforms has also influenced how different generations address each other. A study by the International Journal of Business Communication highlighted that younger generations, who are more accustomed to texting and social media, often use more casual language and abbreviations, even in professional emails and messages .
4. Globalization and Cultural Exchange:
- A report by the World Economic Forum noted that globalization and the increased mobility of younger generations have led to a blending of cultural practices. Younger people are more likely to adopt communication styles from different cultures, leading to a mix of traditional and modern forms of address .
5. Education and Socialization:
- Research by the Journal of Sociolinguistics found that educational institutions are significant in shaping communication styles. Younger generations exposed to diverse and multicultural environments in schools and universities are more likely to adopt informal and inclusive ways of addressing others, reflecting broader societal changes.
These studies and reports suggest that generational overtones indeed play a significant role in shaping communication practices, often surpassing traditional cultural norms. The increasing preference for informality, the influence of digital communication, and the impact of globalization are key factors driving these changes.
There are several studies that have evaluated the psychological effects on older generations cohabitating with Millennials in the workplace. These studies explore aspects such as job satisfaction, stress levels, communication challenges, and intergenerational dynamics. Here are some key findings from relevant research:
1. Intergenerational Conflict and Stress:
- A study published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior found that intergenerational conflict can lead to increased stress and decreased job satisfaction among older employees. The differences in work values, communication styles, and expectations can create tension, particularly when younger employees challenge traditional practices and hierarchies .
2. Positive Intergenerational Interactions:
- Research from the Journal of Applied Psychology indicated that positive interactions between generations can enhance job satisfaction and reduce stress. When older and younger employees engage in mentoring relationships, knowledge sharing, and collaborative projects, it can lead to a more inclusive and supportive work environment .
3. Adaptation and Flexibility:
- A study in the International Journal of Human Resource Management highlighted that older employees who are adaptable and open to change experience less stress and higher job satisfaction when working with Millennials. The ability to embrace new technologies and flexible work practices is crucial for mitigating the negative effects of intergenerational differences .
4. Perceptions of Work Ethic:
- Research in the Journal of Business and Psychology found that older generations often perceive Millennials as having a different work ethic, which can lead to misunderstandings and frustrations. However, when organizations foster an environment of mutual respect and understanding, these perceptions can be positively influenced, leading to better intergenerational cohesion .
5. Training and Development Program:
- Studies have shown that training programs focused on improving intergenerational communication and collaboration can significantly reduce workplace stress and improve relationships between older and younger employees. These programs help bridge the gap by fostering mutual understanding and respect .
Overall, the research suggests that while there can be challenges associated with intergenerational cohabitation in the workplace, proactive strategies such as promoting positive interactions, fostering adaptability, and providing targeted training can mitigate negative effects and enhance the overall work environment.
I think it is the cultural issue. Even in sixties, students used to address professors by their first names many times. Indian students at that time will address professors as 'sir' in the beginning and then Dr. or Prof. so and so. PhD students in my batch would call our professor by his first name, which I could never do and never did. Now in India I think they try to adapt US culture for the wrong reasons.
ReplyDeleteYou are right, when a young kid calls me with my first name I don't like it. But then I realize they have not known any other way. I am trying to teach some people how to address elders respectfully according to Indian tradition and they are receptive.